disable_share
Disable an active share link using its unique ID to revoke access.
Instructions
共有リンクを無効化
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| share_id | Yes | 共有ID(create_share_linkまたはget_share_settingsで取得) |
Disable an active share link using its unique ID to revoke access.
共有リンクを無効化
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| share_id | Yes | 共有ID(create_share_linkまたはget_share_settingsで取得) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states the action without revealing behavioral traits like irreversibility, required permissions, or consequences for existing users. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, directly to the point, no redundant information. Ideal conciseness for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the description omits critical context: what happens when disabled, error conditions, or return values. For a mutation tool, this is incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and the parameter description explains the share_id's origin. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '共有リンクを無効化' (disable share link) clearly states the specific verb (disable) and resource (share link), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_share_link or get_share_settings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites (e.g., the share must be active) or that this should be used after creating a share link.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asicojp/sparksheets-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server