get_low_stock_alerts
Retrieve a list of low-stock or out-of-stock SKUs by setting a custom inventory threshold to prevent stockouts.
Instructions
取得低庫存或缺貨的 SKU 清單,可自訂庫存門檻值。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| threshold | No | 庫存低於此值即警示 |
Retrieve a list of low-stock or out-of-stock SKUs by setting a custom inventory threshold to prevent stockouts.
取得低庫存或缺貨的 SKU 清單,可自訂庫存門檻值。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| threshold | No | 庫存低於此值即警示 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the function without disclosing behaviors such as read-only nature, auth requirements, rate limits, or potential side effects. This minimal disclosure is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, clear sentence with no superfluous words or structure.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list-retrieval tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description is largely sufficient. However, it could briefly mention return type or pagination for completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema coverage is 100% with a description for the threshold parameter. The description adds the same meaning (customizable threshold) without exceeding the schema. Thus baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves a list of SKUs with low or out-of-stock status and allows a customizable inventory threshold. The verb 'get' and resource 'low stock SKUs' are specific, and it differentiates from siblings like get_stock_by_warehouse or get_inventory_overview.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for low stock alerts with a custom threshold, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide when-not-to-use guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asgard-ai-platform/mcp-shopline'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server