delete_affiliate_campaign

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It includes a '副作用' section detailing permanent deletion, irreversibility, and effects on affiliate links. This adequately discloses behavioral traits beyond the input schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with sections for operation type, usage, API, response, and side effects. Information is front-loaded. Could be slightly more concise, but adds useful context like return structure and API endpoint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a simple delete with one parameter, the description covers purpose, usage guidelines, side effects, API endpoint, and return structure. No output schema, but description compensates by listing return fields. Sibling tools provide context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (campaign_id) with 100% schema coverage. Description does not add meaning beyond the schema; it only includes the endpoint. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as schema already documents the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states '永久刪除指定的聯盟行銷活動' (permanently delete specified affiliate campaign), which is a specific verb+resource. It starts with '[WRITE]' and is distinct from sibling tools like create_affiliate_campaign, update_affiliate_campaign, get_affiliate_campaign_detail, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The '用途' section explains when to use the tool: '用於清除已結束、取消或錯誤建立的活動' (for clearing finished, cancelled, or incorrectly created campaigns). This provides clear context, though it does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.