radarr_get_config_importlist_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description's use of 'Fetch' is consistent with that. However, it adds no behavioral context beyond what's in the annotation—e.g., it doesn't note that the operation is non-destructive or that a 404 might occur if the ID doesn't exist. With annotations covering the read-only aspect, a score of 3 is appropriate for a simple get-by-id operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence, which is concise and front-loaded. However, it contains a grammatical error ('import lists' instead of 'import list'), which slightly detracts from its quality. Overall, it's appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there is an output schema and annotations, the description is minimal but not fatally incomplete. It lacks clarity on what 'config import list' refers to, and the singular/plural inconsistency could confuse. For a straightforward read operation, this is adequate but with clear gaps in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single 'id' parameter with no description (0% schema coverage). The description only reiterates 'by id' without explaining what the ID refers to or providing any additional semantic meaning. The description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Fetch a single import lists by id,' which clearly identifies the verb (fetch), resource (import lists), and the id parameter. This distinguishes it from list-style tools like radarr_list_importlist, though the phrasing is slightly ambiguous (e.g., 'single import lists' should be 'single import list') and doesn't explicitly differentiate it from radarr_get_config_importlist.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention that it should be used when you already have an import list ID, nor does it reference sibling tools like radarr_get_config_importlist or radarr_list_importlist. The only hint is the 'by id' in the name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.