radarr_create_customfilter

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states 'WRITE: this modifies your Radarr instance', which adds behavioral context beyond the annotations' readOnlyHint=false. However, it does not detail side effects beyond modification, such as whether filters are appended or replaced. This does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loads the purpose, and every word earns its place. No redundant information or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the tool involves a complex 'body' parameter and nested objects, but the description gives no context about what a custom filter is, what body fields are required, or how the creation behaves. The description is excessively thin for a create tool with an opaque body schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has a single 'body' parameter with 0% description coverage and additionalProperties=true, yet the description provides no information about required fields or expected structure. The description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of parameter detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create custom filters' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like radarr_list_customfilter, radarr_update_customfilter, and radarr_delete_customfilter. The WRITE note reinforces the action type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creation but does not explicitly state when to use this over alternatives. There is no mention of when to use radarr_update_customfilter for modifying existing filters, leaving usage context to be inferred from the tool name and sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.