radarr-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to radarr-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables local LLMs to manage a home media stack including Radarr, Sonarr, Prowlarr, and others.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that exposes Sonarr, Radarr, Lidarr, and Jellyfin to any MCP client through a curated tool layer for LLM consumption.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing Lidarr's full v1 REST API as tools for reading and managing artists, albums, tracks, queue, history, and more. It enables LLMs to interact with a Lidarr instance via natural language.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to connect to a Radarr instance over HTTP to manage and query movies, including listing, searching, triggering downloads, and checking system status.MIT

profilarr-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing Profilarr's v1 REST API as tools, enabling an LLM to inspect and manage linked databases, connected Radarr/Sonarr instances, backups, jobs, announcements, and system status.20MIT- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing Seerr's full v1 REST API as tools, enabling LLMs to search and discover media, manage requests and approvals, users, issues, watchlists, and integration settings for Plex/Jellyfin/Emby and Sonarr/Radarr, including reads and writes with destructive operations flagged.15MIT
TDQS
Scored across 226 tools
Many tools follow a clear resource+action pattern, but there are several ambiguous groups (e.g., radarr_list_queue vs radarr_get_queue_details vs radarr_get_queue_status, and radarr_bulk_edit_moviefiles vs radarr_bulk_update_moviefile). The sheer number of similar resource-specific list/get tools for different contexts (movies, history, blocklist, importlist) could cause misselection.
The dominant pattern is radarr_<verb>_<resource>, but there are deviations: 'action' is a vague verb, 'test_all' is inconsistent with plain 'test', and resource naming varies ('importlist' vs 'import_list', 'moviefile' vs 'moviefiles'). While readable, the inconsistencies could be more standardized.
With 226 tools, this server is massively over-scoped. Even a complex application like Radarr does not need this many discrete operations. The tool count drowns an agent in choices and is far beyond the typical 3-15 well-scoped range.
The tool surface is exhaustively complete, covering full CRUD/lifecycle for all major resources (movies, quality profiles, download clients, indexers, notifications, etc.) plus auxiliary operations like backup, system, and command execution. There are no obvious gaps for the domain.