Skip to main content
Glama
arjshiv

BlazeSQL MCP Server

by arjshiv

BlazeSQL MCP Server

blaze-sql-server is a secure-by-default MCP server and CLI for the BlazeSQL natural-language query API.

It supports two modes:

  • serve: run as an MCP stdio server for Cursor, Claude Desktop, Codex, and other MCP clients

  • query: execute a single BlazeSQL request directly from the shell

Highlights

  • MCP tool: exposes blazesql_query

  • CLI commands: serve, query, doctor, help, version

  • Security defaults: HTTPS-only remote endpoints, bounded timeouts, redacted logging, capped formatted output

  • Validation: runtime config validation plus BlazeSQL response-shape validation

  • Tooling: pnpm, CI, automated tests, and project-level mcporter config

Related MCP server: MySQL MCP Server

Requirements

  • Node.js >=20.11.0

  • pnpm >=10

  • A BlazeSQL API key

Install

pnpm install
cp .env.sample .env

Set at least:

BLAZE_API_KEY=YOUR_API_KEY_HERE

Optional environment variables:

  • BLAZE_API_ENDPOINT

  • BLAZE_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS

  • BLAZE_MAX_RESPONSE_CHARS

  • BLAZE_LOG_LEVEL

  • BLAZE_ALLOW_INSECURE_ENDPOINT

Build

pnpm build

Run As MCP Server

For backward compatibility, running the binary with no arguments starts the stdio server:

node build/index.js

Explicitly:

node build/index.js serve

The exposed MCP tool is:

  • blazesql_query

  • db_id: BlazeSQL database ID

  • natural_language_request: the prompt to send to BlazeSQL

Use With MCPorter

MCPorter can discover this server automatically via the project-level config at config/mcporter.json.

From the project root:

npx mcporter list
npx mcporter call blazesql.blazesql_query db_id:"your_db_id" natural_language_request:"show me total users"

Ad hoc usage from anywhere:

npx mcporter call --stdio "node /path/to/blaze-sql-mcp-server/build/index.js" --name blazesql blazesql.blazesql_query db_id:"your_db_id" natural_language_request:"total sales last month"

Run As CLI

Print help:

node build/index.js --help

Run a direct query:

node build/index.js query --db-id db_demo --request "show me total users by city"

Use positional arguments:

node build/index.js query db_demo "show me total users by city"

Read the request from stdin:

printf 'show me total users by city\n' | node build/index.js query db_demo --stdin

Available output formats:

node build/index.js query db_demo "show me total users by city" --format markdown
node build/index.js query db_demo "show me total users by city" --format text
node build/index.js query db_demo "show me total users by city" --format json

Diagnostics

Check runtime configuration:

node build/index.js doctor
node build/index.js doctor --json

doctor is safe to run in shared terminals: it never prints the raw API key.

Validate

pnpm typecheck
pnpm test
pnpm check

MCP Client Configuration

Example stdio command:

/absolute/path/to/node /absolute/path/to/blaze-sql-mcp-server/build/index.js

Because the binary defaults to serve, MCP clients do not need an extra subcommand.

Design Notes

The CLI shape intentionally follows the same single-purpose command pattern popularized by tools like mcporter: a predictable command surface, direct shell usage, and one obvious machine-readable mode where it matters.

Available Tools

1 tool
blazesql_queryB

Executes a natural language query against a specified BlazeSQL database.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
db_idYesThe ID of the BlazeSQL database connection to query.
natural_language_requestYesThe query expressed in natural language (e.g., 'show me total users per city').

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
queryYesThe SQL query generated and executed by BlazeSQL.
data_resultYesThe structured data returned by the query, as a map of column names to value arrays.
agent_responseYesNatural language explanation of the results from BlazeSQL.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool executes queries but doesn't describe traits like error handling, performance implications, authentication needs, or rate limits. For a query execution tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and appropriately sized, making it easy to understand quickly. Every part of the sentence contributes to clarifying the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has an output schema (which handles return values), 100% schema coverage, and no annotations, the description is minimally complete. It covers the basic purpose but lacks behavioral context and usage guidelines. For a query tool with no annotations, it should do more to compensate, but the output schema mitigates some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters (db_id and natural_language_request) with clear descriptions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as examples or constraints. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('executes') and resource ('natural language query against a specified BlazeSQL database'). It distinguishes what it does (execute natural language queries) from potential alternatives (like SQL queries), though without sibling tools, differentiation isn't needed. However, it could be more specific about the type of queries or results.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. It mentions the tool's function but lacks context on appropriate scenarios, such as when natural language queries are supported or if there are limitations. With no sibling tools, this gap is less critical but still present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool has a clearly defined purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in the set.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency as there are no other tools to compare it against. The tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (blazesql_query) which would be consistent if more tools existed.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is generally too few for a database query server, as it lacks basic operations like listing databases, describing schemas, or managing connections. This minimal set limits functionality and forces all interactions through one interface.

Completeness2/5

The tool surface is severely incomplete for a SQL database server. While the query tool covers execution, there are obvious gaps such as no tools for schema exploration, database listing, transaction management, or data manipulation beyond queries, which will cause agent failures in many workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to access and interact with database connections, including viewing schemas and performing CRUD operations on connected databases.
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to interact with MySQL databases through natural language, supporting SQL queries, table creation, and schema exploration.
    3
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs like Claude to interact with SQLite and SQL Server databases, allowing for schema inspection and SQL query execution.
    806
    380
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/arjshiv/blaze-sql-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server