ScienceON-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to ScienceON-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Korea's NTIS (National Science and Technology Information Service) operated by KISTI. Search national R\&D projects, public announcements, and research programs.32 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enables searching Korean patents, trademarks, and designs via KIPRIS Plus open APIs. Supports keyword, advanced, applicant, and rightholder searches with detailed bibliographic lookup.7102 npm54MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that searches Korean academic databases (KCI, DBpia, RISS) via their official Open APIs, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to retrieve academic papers.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching and accessing Korean public data from data.go.kr, enabling dataset search, metadata lookup, and data retrieval/download via Python API or CLI.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates with KISTI's ScienceON, NTIS, and DataON APIs to search and retrieve scientific papers, patents, reports, national R\&D projects, and research data.16Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International

dartpoint-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for public disclosure information of Korean companies, powered by the dartpoint.ai API.3Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools follow a clear search/detail pairing per entity type, making purposes distinct. The only slight ambiguity is between scienceon_news_trends and scienceon_weekly_news, but descriptions clarify one is a searchable archive and the other is a curated weekly digest.
All tools share the scienceon_ prefix and use snake_case. Search tools are named by entity (e.g., scienceon_papers), detail tools append _details, and special tools like scienceon_patent_citations and scienceon_weekly_news are descriptive without breaking the convention.
At 17 tools, this exceeds the typical 3-15 range, but the broad scope (papers, patents, reports, researchers, organizations, etc.) justifies the number. Each tool has a clear role, so the count feels reasonable rather than bloated.
The server covers search and detail for most major content types, plus patent citations and weekly news. Minor gaps exist: tech trends lack a detail tool, weekly news has no separate detail view, and paper citations are not offered. These are workable but not fully complete.