open_in_tableau_public

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description does well to disclose key behaviors: it waits for the window and returns error verbatim. However, it does not explicitly state whether the tool modifies the workbook or the Tableau environment, though 'open' implies read-only. The waiting behavior is clearly mentioned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no wasted words. It front-loads the main action and immediately provides additional context about waiting and error handling.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the essential behavior: opening a workbook, waiting for the window, and returning errors. It is slightly ambiguous about what happens on success (presumably returns nothing or success indicator), but overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no additional meaning to the parameters beyond what the input schema provides. The path parameter is already described as 'Absolute .twb or .twbx path' in the schema, and timeout_s has default/min/max bounds. The description's mention of 'Open a generated workbook' implicitly references the path but does not enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('open'), the resource ('generated workbook in Tableau Public'), and the specific behavior ('wait for its window', 'returns load error verbatim'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'publish_to_tableau_public' or 'validate_in_tableau_public' by focusing on opening and waiting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for opening a generated workbook, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives like 'validate_in_tableau_public' or 'publish_to_tableau_public'. No when-not or exclusions provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.