get_authoring_capabilities

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Read-only behavior is mentioned, which is transparent given no annotations. However, the description does not elaborate on potential nuances like data freshness or permission requirements, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no fluff, front-loaded with purpose. Every word contributes meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple info tool, but lacks details on output format or the meaning of 'capabilities'. Given no output schema, more detail would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has zero parameters with 100% coverage, so description adds value by explaining the output categories. Baseline of 4 is appropriate as it compensates for lack of output schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool reports three specific categories: authoring capabilities, Tableau Public installation, and macOS permission state. Verb 'report' and resource are specific and distinct from sibling tools which focus on workbook operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'get_tableau_public_app_status'. The read-only nature is noted but not contextualized relative to sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.