list_workbook_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Only states 'Read-only' as behavioral info. No annotations exist, so description should disclose more (e.g., if requires auth, any side effects). Minimal for a no-annotation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no waste. Essential info is front-loaded. Efficient for a simple list tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Describes output sufficiently for a parameterless list tool. Lacks mention of how output can be used with sibling tools (e.g., building a workbook), but given simplicity, adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds context about return values (required shelves), which enhances understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States exact action (list) and resource (supported worksheet templates) with output details (required shelves). Clearly distinguishes from sibling tools that validate, build, or publish.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use or alternatives. With siblings like get_authoring_capabilities and validate_workbook_spec, the description provides no context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.