get_smb_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that it reads back configuration and the live connection state, which implies a read-only operation, but does not explicitly state that it is non-mutating, require no special permissions, or describe any side effects. Moderate transparency without annotation support.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that lists the exact fields returned. No unnecessary words, and it earns its place by specifying the precise configuration items.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so the description does not need to explain return values in detail; it instead summarizes the fields, which is helpful. The description is complete for a zero-parameter read tool, though it lacks explicit usage guidance against siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly enumerates what the return values include, which is useful context even though no parameters exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Read back the SMB share configuration') and enumerates the exact fields returned: server path, user name, password, auto-connect flag, and live connection state. This distinguishes it from siblings like get_smb_status, configure_smb, and smb_connect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (reading back config), but does not explicitly state when to use this versus get_smb_status or configure_smb. No when-not or alternative routing is provided. Implied usage only.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.