remove_avatar_from_meeting

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states that the bot leaves 'gracefully', which is vague. It does not mention whether this action is destructive, irreversible, or if it has side effects (e.g., deleting recorded data). No mention of required permissions or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences and a parameter line. It front-loads the purpose in the first sentence, and every word adds value. No fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this simple tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description covers the essential action. However, it does not mention what happens after removal (e.g., can the bot be re-added? Is the bot destroyed?). While the output schema may provide return info, the description feels minimal for full completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, but the description provides crucial context: 'The Recall bot ID returned by add_avatar_to_meeting'. This tells the agent exactly where to get the parameter and implies it is a required identifier. This fully compensates for the schema's lack of description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove' and the resource 'avatar from a video meeting'. It also explains that it makes the Recall bot leave gracefully, which is a specific and unambiguous purpose. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like add_avatar_to_meeting and get_meeting_bot_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies that this tool should be used after add_avatar_to_meeting, as the bot_id comes from that call. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor does it provide conditions like 'only use if the bot is currently in a meeting' or mention the consequences of calling it without an active bot.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.