get_knowledge_group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states 'Get details' implying a read operation, but does not mention error handling, permissions, rate limits, or side effects. This is minimal for a tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using one sentence and an Args list. It avoids unnecessary detail. The structure is clear, though the Args section could be integrated more naturally. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema, so return values are defined elsewhere. The description adequately explains the input parameter and purpose. For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter, this is sufficient, though it could mention that the group_id is required (already in schema).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameter descriptions, but the description includes 'group_id: The UUID of the knowledge group to retrieve' in the Args section, adding meaning beyond the schema. It specifies the expected format (UUID) and purpose, compensating for the 0% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get details of a specific knowledge group by ID', specifying the verb (get), resource (knowledge group), and identifier (by ID). This distinguishes it from siblings like 'search_knowledge_group' (search) and 'update_knowledge_group' (update).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, context, or when not to use it. For a simple retrieval tool, some context could be provided about the necessity of having the group ID beforehand.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.