Skip to main content
Glama
alxgmpr

serial-mcp

by alxgmpr

serial_command

Send a command to a serial device and wait for its response, with optional regex pattern matching and automated reply for time-sensitive interactions.

Instructions

Send a command and wait for the response. This is the primary tool for interacting with serial devices — it combines write + read into a single atomic operation.

If expect is provided, waits until that regex pattern appears in the response. Without expect, waits for the device to stop sending (300ms of silence after last received byte).

If respond or respond_hex is provided along with expect, the response is sent immediately when the pattern matches — before this tool returns. This enables sub-millisecond triggered responses for time-sensitive sequences. The respond string is sent as-is (no newline appended).

Examples: - Linux shell: serial_command(data="ls -la", expect="\$") - AT modem: serial_command(data="AT", expect="OK|ERROR") - Router CLI: serial_command(data="show version", expect="#") - Simple ping: serial_command(data="hello", timeout=2) - Reboot + catch bootloader: serial_command(data="reboot", expect="Hit any key", respond=" ")

Args: data: Text to send to the device expect: Regex pattern to wait for in the response (e.g. "\$", "OK", ">") timeout: Max seconds to wait for response (default 5) session_id: Port name of the session. Optional if only one session is open. encoding: Character encoding (default utf-8) append_newline: Whether to append \r\n to the data (default True) respond: Text to send immediately when expect pattern matches (sent as-is, no newline) respond_hex: Hex bytes to send when expect pattern matches (e.g. "7F", "AA 55")

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
expectNo
respondNo
timeoutNo
encodingNoutf-8
session_idNo
respond_hexNo
append_newlineNo
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description details the atomic write-read operation, waiting mechanisms (regex pattern or 300ms silence), triggered responses via 'respond'/'respond_hex', and newline handling. Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and openWorldHint=true, consistent with the description's write and potentially interactive behavior. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a clear opening statement, behavior explanation, examples, and parameter list. While somewhat lengthy, the detail is justified by the tool's complexity. Front-loading is effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (8 parameters, no output schema), the description covers input parameters comprehensively. However, it does not explicitly state the return value (the response), which is only implied. Still, it provides sufficient context for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description provides thorough explanations for all 8 parameters in the Args section, including defaults and special behaviors (e.g., 'respond' sent as-is, no newline). Examples illustrate parameter usage, adding significant value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Send a command and wait for the response' and identifies itself as the primary tool for interacting with serial devices, combining write and read. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like serial_write and serial_read.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use this tool (primary interaction) and provides examples for various scenarios (shell, modem, router CLI, ping, reboot). It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the behavior with and without 'expect' is clearly described, guiding appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alxgmpr/serial-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server