update_sc_agent_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses partial update behavior and notes that configuration rules vary by database type, but lacks details on permissions, side effects, or reversibility. The reference to create_sc_agent_task delegates some behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: two sentences that efficiently state the purpose, partial update nature, and a note about configuration rules. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the schema covers all parameters and an output schema exists, the description is mostly complete for an update tool. It delegates configuration rule details to create_sc_agent_task, which is acceptable, but could include a brief note about the output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds that only provided fields change, which clarifies update semantics, but does not provide additional meaning beyond the schema descriptions for individual parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update an agent task' with a specific verb and resource. It also mentions 'Only provided fields change,' which clarifies the partial update nature, and distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_sc_agent_task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates usage for updates via the verb 'Update', and references create_sc_agent_task for details, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create or delete). Without explicit when-not or alternative guidance, it scores a 3.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.