find_notes_in_notebook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It covers pagination behavior, notebook specification by name/path, and filter parameters. It mentions return type ('str: List of all notes with pagination info') but doesn't detail the exact structure. Overall, it provides adequate behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat verbose with emphasized text and multiple examples. While well-structured into sections, it could be more concise. Every sentence adds value, but some redundancy exists (e.g., repeated 'MAIN FUNCTION').

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters, many optional, and an output schema present, the description covers the key aspects: how to specify notebooks, pagination, filtering by task/completed, and sorting. It doesn't mention error handling or edge cases, but is sufficiently complete for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds value beyond the schema by explaining notebook path syntax ('Work' vs 'Projects/Work'), showing examples with task and completed filters, and illustrating pagination. This goes beyond the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it finds all notes in a specific notebook with pagination. The phrase 'MAIN FUNCTION FOR NOTEBOOK SEARCHES!' and examples differentiate it from siblings like 'find_notes' (which likely searches all notebooks) and 'find_notes_with_tag'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this when you want to find all notes in a specific notebook.' It provides notebook path syntax and examples, making the usage context clear. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.