Skip to main content
Glama
Joplin MCP Server

Joplin MCP Server

by alondmnt

Related Servers

Alternatives to Joplin MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Joplin notes, notebooks, and tags through a standardized MCP interface, supporting search, creation, updates, deletion, tagging, trash recovery, file import, and notebook allowlisting.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with the Joplin note-taking app to search, read, create, update, delete, tag, import, and restore notes, notebooks, and tags through a standardized MCP interface.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Joplin notes, notebooks, tags, and resources through a standardized MCP interface, supporting search, CRUD operations, tagging, trash recovery, and file imports. It also provides optional permission controls and notebook allowlisting for scoped access.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to browse, search, create, edit, organize, import, and delete notes, notebooks, and tags in the Joplin note-taking app through a standardized MCP interface, with configurable permissions and notebook allowlists.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Joplin notes and notebooks, including searching, reading, and listing notebooks through natural language commands via the MCP protocol.
      137 npm
      50
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: note retrieval, resource inspection, link analysis, targeted editing, and various search scopes are cleanly separated. The overlap between update_note and edit_note is explicitly addressed in their descriptions, and the find_* variants are scoped by content, tag, notebook, or single-note regex.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_*, get_*, create_*, find_*, tag/untag_*). Minor deviations like ping_joplin and the mix of list_tags vs get_tags_by_note prevent a perfect score, but the conventions are still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the count is justified by the domain covering notes, notebooks, tags, resources, links, search, and trash recovery. No tool feels redundant, though a few could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers create, read, update, search, tagging, and restore workflows well, but notably lacks delete/trash operations for notes, notebooks, and tags. An agent cannot remove content or clean up unused tags, which is a significant gap for a notes management server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessResponsive