Skip to main content
Glama

er_record_delete

Delete a specific record from an Edge Routine to manage data and maintain system integrity within ESA services.

Instructions

Delete a specified record associated with an Edge Routine (ER).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesThe name of the routine
recordIdNoThe ID of the record
siteIdYesThe ID of the site
recordNameYesThe name of the record

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function for the 'er_record_delete' tool. It invokes the API to delete the routine-related record using the provided arguments and returns a success response with the JSON-stringified result.
    export const er_record_delete = async (request: CallToolRequest) => {
      const res = await api.deleteRoutineRelatedRecord(
        request.params.arguments as DeleteRoutineRelatedRecordRequest,
      );
      return {
        content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(res) }],
        success: true,
      };
    };
  • The tool schema definition for 'er_record_delete', including name, description, and inputSchema specifying parameters: name (string), recordId (number), siteId (number), recordName (string). Note: recordId is not required.
    export const ER_RECORD_DELETE_TOOL: Tool = {
      name: 'er_record_delete',
      description:
        'Delete a specified record associated with an Edge Routine (ER).',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          name: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'The name of the routine',
          },
          recordId: {
            type: 'number',
            description: 'The ID of the record',
          },
          siteId: {
            type: 'number',
            description: 'The ID of the site',
          },
          recordName: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'The name of the record',
          },
        },
        required: ['name', 'siteId', 'recordName'],
      },
    };
  • Registration of the ER_RECORD_DELETE_TOOL in the ESA_OPENAPI_ER_LIST array, which collects tools for the MCP server.
    export const ESA_OPENAPI_ER_LIST = [
      HTML_DEPLOY_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_CREATE_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_DELETE_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_LIST_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_GET_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_CODE_COMMIT_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_CODE_DEPLOY_TOOL,
      ROUTINE_ROUTE_LIST_TOOL,
      DEPLOYMENT_DELETE_TOOL,
      SITE_ACTIVE_LIST_TOOL,
      SITE_ROUTE_LIST_TOOL,
      ROUTE_CREATE_TOOL,
      ROUTE_DELETE_TOOL,
      ROUTE_UPDATE_TOOL,
      ROUTE_GET_TOOL,
      SITE_MATCH_TOOL,
      ER_RECORD_CREATE_TOOL,
      ER_RECORD_DELETE_TOOL,
      ER_RECORD_LIST_TOOL,
    ];
  • Registration of the er_record_delete handler function in the esaHandlers object, mapping tool names to their execution functions.
    export const esaHandlers: ToolHandlers = {
      site_active_list,
      site_match,
      site_route_list,
      site_record_list,
      routine_create,
      routine_code_commit,
      routine_delete,
      routine_list,
      routine_get,
      routine_code_deploy,
      routine_route_list,
      deployment_delete,
      route_create,
      route_delete,
      route_update,
      route_get,
      er_record_create,
      er_record_delete,
      er_record_list,
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While 'Delete' implies a destructive operation, it doesn't specify whether this action is irreversible, requires specific permissions, has side effects, or includes confirmation steps. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded and wastes no space, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It lacks critical information about behavioral traits, error handling, return values, and differentiation from sibling tools, leaving significant gaps for an AI agent to understand proper usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the schema already documents all four parameters. The description doesn't add any meaning beyond what's in the schema, such as explaining relationships between parameters or providing examples. The baseline score of 3 is appropriate when the schema handles parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the target ('a specified record associated with an Edge Routine'), which is specific and unambiguous. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'delete_record' or 'routine_delete', which handle similar deletion operations but for different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'delete_record' or 'routine_delete', nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions. It merely states what the tool does without contextual usage information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aliyun/mcp-server-esa'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server