A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceModel Context Protocol server that standardizes tool discovery, execution, and context management for AI applications.
MIT
ESA MCP Server
by aliyun
Related Servers
Alternatives to ESA MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server that implements the Model Context Protocol, providing a standardized way to connect AI models to different data sources and tools.8 npm11MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA demonstration implementation of the Model Context Protocol server that facilitates communication between AI models and external tools while maintaining context awareness.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceThis server implements the Model Context Protocol to facilitate meaningful interaction and understanding development between humans and AI through structured tools and progressive interaction patterns.57-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that connects AI agents with CrowdStrike Falcon platform for intelligent security analysis and automation.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Python-based implementation of the Model Context Protocol that enables communication between a model context management server and client through a request-response architecture.-
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 42 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap in DNS record creation tools (e.g., create_site_a_or_aaaa_record, create_site_cname_record, etc.), which could cause confusion as they all create DNS records but for different types. The descriptions help differentiate them, but the naming doesn't clearly indicate the record type in all cases.
Naming Consistency3/5
The naming is mixed with some consistency within groups (e.g., create_site_*_record for DNS, er_record_* for Edge Routine records), but there are deviations like html_deploy, site_active_list, and site_match that don't follow a clear pattern. Overall, it's readable but lacks a uniform convention across all tools.
Tool Count2/5
With 42 tools, the count is too high for the apparent scope of managing websites, DNS, certificates, and Edge Routines. This many tools can overwhelm agents and suggests fragmentation, such as separate tools for each DNS record type instead of a unified create_record with parameters.
Completeness5/5
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for the domain, including site management (create, list, pause), DNS operations (create, get, list, update, delete for various record types), certificate handling (apply, get, set, delete, list), and Edge Routine lifecycle (create, get, list, delete, code commit/deploy, route management). No obvious gaps are present for core workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive