upservice_update_sprint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations show idempotentHint true and openWorldHint true, but the description does not explain side effects, permissions, or behavior like merging extra_fields. It adds little beyond stating 'Update,' leaving transparency gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact: purpose in the first sentence, then args and return summarized. Every sentence adds value, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Includes return type (str JSON) and output schema exists, so completeness is good. However, given openWorldHint, more context on side effects would improve it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides descriptions for each parameter. The description lists the parameters but adds minimal extra meaning; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a sprint's title or dates,' specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_sprint, complete_sprint, and delete_sprint, which have different actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for updating title and dates, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives (e.g., when to use complete_sprint instead) or conditions like sprint status.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.