upservice_activate_sprint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide idempotency, non-read-only, non-destructive hints. Description adds only 'start it' which rephrases activation. No additional behavioral details beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise with a clear first sentence. Includes docstring-style sections, but the args/returns section partially duplicates schema info. Could be slightly more front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with one parameter and output schema present, the description covers basic purpose and return. Missing error conditions or preconditions, but annotations fill some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% per context signals, meaning the schema lacks descriptions. The description minimally restates 'sprint_id (int)' without adding new meaning like constraints or data format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'Activate a sprint' and parenthetically explains 'start it'. Differentiates from sibling tools like upservice_complete_sprint, upservice_create_sprint, and upservice_delete_sprint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, conditions, or when not to use. Lacks context for selecting this over related sprint tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.