Skip to main content
Glama
alexd73

PlanfixMCP

by alexd73

update_task

Update an existing Planfix task by its number. Modify any field: name, status, assignees, dates, description, custom fields.

Instructions

Обновить задачу по номеру

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoTask number. Specify an existing task by number.
nameNoTask title/name.
filesNoExisting Planfix files attached to the task. Each item must contain an existing file id.
objectNoTask object. Specify an existing object by number.
parentNoParent task. Specify an existing task by number.
silentNoSilent modefalse
statusNoTask status. Specify an existing task status by id.
overdueNoWhether the task is marked as overdue.
projectNoProject where the task belongs. Specify an existing project by number.
assignerNoTask assigner. Specify an existing employee by number.
auditorsNoTask auditors. Specify employees or contacts in users and groups in groups. Employee/contact identifiers must be prefixed, for example user:5 or contact:92.
dateTimeNoTask creation date and time as TimePoint.
durationNoTask duration value. The unit is defined by durationUnit.
id__pathYesNumber of task (Path parameter)
priorityNoTask priority. Use Urgent for urgent tasks and NotUrgent for regular priority tasks.
templateNoTask template. Specify an existing task template by number.
assigneesNoTask assignees. Specify employees or contacts in users and groups in groups. Employee/contact identifiers must be prefixed, for example user:5 or contact:92.
isDeletedNoWhether the task is deleted.
isSummaryNoWhether the task is a summary task.
processIdNoTask process id.
hasEndDateNoWhether the task has a due date.
hasEndTimeNoWhether the task due date includes a time.
descriptionNoTask description.
endDateTimeNoTask due date and time as TimePoint.
inFavoritesNoWhether the task is in favorites.
counterpartyNoTask counterparty. Specify an existing contact/company by number.
durationTypeNoHow duration is calculated: CalendarDays for calendar days or WorkerDays for working days.
durationUnitNoUnit for task duration: Minute, Hour, Day, Week, or Month.
hasStartDateNoWhether the task has a start date.
hasStartTimeNoWhether the task start date includes a time.
isSequentialNoWhether the task is marked as sequential, meaning it participates in a sequential task/subtask chain where the next task is activated after the previous one is completed or becomes inactive.
participantsNoTask participants. Specify employees or contacts in users and groups in groups. Employee/contact identifiers must be prefixed, for example user:5 or contact:92.
startDateTimeNoTask start date and time as TimePoint.
resultCheckingNoWhether the task requires mandatory result checking.
sourceObjectIdNoUnique identifier of the specific object in the third-party application or system.
closeToDeadLineNoWhether the task is close to its deadline.
customFieldDataNoCustom field values for the task. Each item contains a custom field id in field.id and its value.
delayedTillDateNoDate and time until which the task is delayed/postponed as TimePoint.
notAcceptedInTimeNoWhether the task was not accepted in time.
sourceDataVersionNoVersion of the object data in the third-party application or system.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
failuresNo
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavioral traits. It merely says 'update' without explaining whether the update is partial or full, what happens to unspecified fields, whether it is idempotent, or any side effects. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool with 40 parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the core purpose. It is not verbose and earns its place, though it is extremely brief given the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 40 parameters, an output schema, and no annotations, yet the description is only one short phrase. It fails to provide essential context about update semantics, field mutability, or behavioral expectations, making it completely inadequate for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already thoroughly documents all parameters. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Обновить задачу по номеру' (Update task by number) clearly states the action (update) and resource (task), with the 'by number' qualifier indicating identification via task number. It is unambiguous and sufficiently specific, though it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like create_task or task_by_id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_task or explicit conditions for updating. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context about preferred usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alexd73/PlanfixMCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server