Skip to main content
Glama
alexd73

PlanfixMCP

by alexd73
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to PlanfixMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • @kama/mcp-server

      AsemanServer
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that auto-discovers Kama CRM API endpoints from OpenAPI spec and exposes them as tools for AI agents to perform CRM operations via natural language.
      38 npm
      MIT

    • OpenAPI MCP Bridge

      samuellawrence
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A generic MCP server that converts any OpenAPI/Swagger specification into MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to search, explore, and execute REST APIs.
      MIT

    • OpenAPI MCP

      pvliesdonk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A generic MCP server that builds its tools at runtime from any OpenAPI specification, enabling interaction with any REST API through natural language.
      MIT

    • data-mcp

      Tattzy25
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server generated from an OpenAPI Specification, exposing tools via HTTP. It allows clients to invoke API operations using JSON-RPC 2.0 requests.
      1 npm
      Artistic 2.0

    • openapi-mcp

      wate
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automatically generates MCP server tools from OpenAPI specifications, enabling LLMs to interact with any API defined by an OpenAPI spec through natural language.
      9 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are grouped by resource (contact, task, project, comment) with clear prefixes, making most purposes distinct. However, the two datatag tools for new vs existing comments and the generic comment tools could cause some confusion.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is mixed: some tools follow verb-first (update_contact, create_task) while others are noun-first (contact_list, task_by_id). While still readable, the inconsistency makes it harder to predict tool names.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the set is quite large, exceeding the 25-tool threshold. Many tools cover niche features like datatags and templates, which adds cognitive load and makes the set feel over-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers create, read, and update for contacts, tasks, and projects, but lacks delete operations for these core resources. Comments and datatags are well handled, but the missing deletes are a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources