task_comments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not mention whether the operation is read-only, whether pagination is involved, or any side effects. This leaves the agent without critical safety or behavior information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief, but this is under-specification rather than concise efficiency. It is a single noun phrase that fails to convey any operational detail, so the brevity does not serve a useful purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's six parameters and numerous sibling tools, the description is inadequate. Even with an output schema present, the lack of purpose, usage guidance, and behavioral transparency makes the tool selection and invocation ambiguous and error-prone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67%, leaving typeList and resultOrder without descriptions. The tool description adds no parameter explanations and does not compensate for the gaps. It repeats nothing that the schema already provides, and offers no additional semantic context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Комментарии к задаче' ('Task comments') is a noun phrase that simply restates the tool name without stating what action it performs. It lacks a verb (e.g., list, get, create) and does not clarify whether the tool retrieves, creates, or updates comments, making it essentially a tautology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus sibling tools such as add_task_comment, comment_list, or task_by_id, nor does it mention any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.