set_app_availability

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The warning 'This replaces the current availability' discloses a key behavioral trait: the operation is a full replacement, not additive. With no annotations provided, this warning is valuable. However, it does not mention authorization needs or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. The purpose is stated first, followed by a critical warning. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core operation and the replacement nature, but lacks context on prerequisites, response format, or relationship to sibling tools like 'get_app_availability'. Given no output schema, more detail on what happens post-operation would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add parameter details. The description does not elaborate on parameters beyond what the schema already provides, meeting the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets app availability and territories, with a specific verb 'Set' and resource 'app availability and territories'. It distinguishes from the read-only sibling 'get_app_availability'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, such as 'get_app_availability' for reading current availability or other update tools. The description lacks context on prerequisites or scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.