create_app_store_review_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Create' with no mention of prerequisites, side effects, error conditions (e.g., if review details already exist), or whether the operation is idempotent. This is insufficient for a write operation without annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no fluff. It front-loads the action and usage context, making it easy for an agent to quickly understand the tool's purpose and when to use it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having 9 parameters (many optional) and no output schema, the description does not explain the return value, prerequisites (e.g., version must exist), or any constraints on the fields. Given the complexity and lack of annotations, more context is needed for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 9 parameters. The tool description adds no additional meaning or context beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Create' and the resource 'App Store review details for a version'. It also distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_app_store_review_detail' and 'update_app_store_review_detail' by implying it is for initial creation only.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes explicit guidance: 'Use this if no review details exist yet.' This provides clear context for when to use the tool. It does not explicitly state when not to use, but the existence of sibling 'update_app_store_review_detail' implies the alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.