create_app_info_localization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Create' and implies mutation, but does not mention idempotency, duplicate handling, dependencies (e.g., app_info_id must exist), or side effects. This is insufficient for a create tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise—two sentences, no wasted words. The first sentence states the action and resource, the second adds usage context. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should hint at return values or errors. It does not. It also lacks prerequisites or notes on when to use this vs update_app_info_localization. For a tool with 7 parameters and many siblings, more completeness is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds context by mentioning 'app name and subtitle' but ignores other parameters like privacy_policy_text. It does not explain required vs optional or add significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and resource 'app info localization', specifying it is for a specific locale and to add app name and subtitle. This distinguishes it from siblings like update_app_info_localization and list_app_info_localizations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to add app name and subtitle for a new language,' which implies when to use it (for new languages). It does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives like list or update, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.