get_model_resume_package

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description alone must convey behavioral traits. It states the tool generates a package but does not disclose whether it is a read-only operation, modifies state, or requires specific permissions. The mention of 'safe/do-not-touch files' hints at outputs but lacks explicit behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the purpose and use cases. The colon-delimited list of components is efficient, though the sentence is somewhat dense. It could be split for clarity, but overall it is concise and avoids redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (one parameter, no output schema), the description should explain the return value and prerequisites. It does not describe what the generated package contains in terms of format or how to use the task_id. The lack of output schema amplifies this gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter (task_id) with 0% schema description coverage. The description does not mention task_id, explain its purpose, format, or how to obtain it. This is a critical gap for a single-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates a 'Model Resume Package' for specific scenarios (swap/restart/crash recovery) and lists components (goal, task, constraints, failures, files). This is a specific verb+resource, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like 'resume_task' by naming the use cases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly specifies when to use the tool: 'for model swap/editor restart/crash recovery'. This provides clear context, though it does not mention when not to use or suggest alternatives, missing some guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.