browser_hover
Hover over any webpage element by providing its CSS selector.
Instructions
Hover over an element by CSS selector.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| selector | Yes | CSS selector for element |
Hover over any webpage element by providing its CSS selector.
Hover over an element by CSS selector.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| selector | Yes | CSS selector for element |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states the action but does not disclose side effects (e.g., triggering JavaScript events, potential errors, or state changes). Minimal behavioral insight.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, efficient and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter, but lacks behavioral context (e.g., error handling, element visibility requirements). Minimally adequate for a basic operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'selector' described. Description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (hover) and the resource (element by CSS selector). It distinguishes from sibling tools like browser_navigate and browser_screenshot which perform different actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Missing prerequisites (e.g., page must be loaded), behavior on missing elements, and comparison to other browser tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ahmed-coding/Gravitas-Core'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server