axint.activate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description reinforces annotations by specifying it is read-only, writes no files, and uses no network. Adds valuable behavioral context beyond the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat repetitive, stating 'Use immediately after installing or connecting Axint' twice in different wording. While front-loaded and clear, it could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one optional parameter and clear annotations, the description provides sufficient context about purpose, behavior, and when to use it. The presence of an output schema (as indicated) reduces the need to explain return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter 'format' is well-described in the schema. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond what the schema provides, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it runs a source-free compiler smoke test through the Axint pipeline, distinguishing it from other tools like axint.compile or axint.run. The purpose is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use after installing or connecting Axint, providing clear context. However, it does not mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives, though the sibling list provides some differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.