Skip to main content
Glama

axint.swift.fix

Read-onlyIdempotent

Automatically corrects mechanical Swift errors identified during validation, using 20+ fix rules to repair code.

Instructions

Auto-fix mechanical Swift errors detected by axint.swift.validate. Handles 20+ fix rules: rewrites @State let → @State var, injects perform() into AppIntents, drops var body stubs into Widgets and Apps, adds let date: Date to TimelineEntry,... Use: use after swift.validate when errors are mechanical; inspect remaining diagnostics manually. Effects: read-only fixed-source output; writes no files and uses no network.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sourceYesFull Swift source code to fix.
fileNoOptional file name to attach to diagnostics.
formatNoWhen true (default), pipes the repaired Swift through swift-format with Axint's house style. Falls back to...

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesPrimary Axint tool response text, matching the first text content block.
isErrorNoWhether Axint marked the tool response as an error.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses read-only fixed-source output, no file writing, no network use, complementing annotations with specific behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise 4-sentence description front-loads purpose, lists examples, gives usage, and states effects with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, effects, and examples; output schema exists, so return value explanation unnecessary; no gaps given tool complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters with descriptions; description adds no significant parameter detail beyond mentioning format behavior, meeting baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it auto-fixes mechanical Swift errors from axint.swift.validate, listing specific fix rules, distinguishing it from sibling validation tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says use after swift.validate for mechanical errors and to inspect remaining diagnostics manually, providing clear when-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/agenticempire/axint'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server