Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to await-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query and monitor service status, latency, and performance through configurable checks (HTTP, TCP, SSL, keyword, JSON-path) and exposes tools for listing services, retrieving metrics, and running on-demand checks.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to extract structured content from URLs, search the web via DuckDuckGo, monitor site availability, and convert HTML to markdown without requiring API keys.
      5
      36 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to validate AI infrastructure claims, check endpoint availability, solve CAPTCHA challenges, convert web pages to Markdown, search the web, extract structured JSON, and fetch bot-protected HTML through native tool calls.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a single browser_task tool that lets coding agents delegate a complete browser automation subtask—navigating to a URL and achieving a goal via Chrome DevTools Protocol—with progress reporting and cancellation.
      350 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides workspace-scoped file operations and command execution tools for building Cursor-style agents, along with system prompts and tool definitions for LLM integration.
      5
      21 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct condition type: shell command, URL, or file. The purpose of each is clear, and there is no meaningful overlap in their intended use cases. An agent can easily select the right tool based on the resource it needs to wait on.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent verb_noun pattern of 'await_' followed by the target resource (command, url, file). This makes the tool names predictable and easy to remember. The naming convention is uniform throughout the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With three tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of providing wait-for-condition primitives. Each tool covers a distinct and common category of waiting (shell, HTTP, file), so the count feels neither thin nor excessive for the domain.

    Completeness5/5

    The three tools cover the primary methods for blocking on external signals: command exit status, URL availability/response, and file presence/content. This set provides a solid foundation for waiting on common CI/CD, deployment, and build scenarios. While a generic 'sleep' tool is absent, the command-based approach can handle arbitrary delays, making the surface reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues