Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
await_commandA

Block agent execution until a shell command exits with code 0 (success). The command is polled at regular intervals. The agent is stuck on this call until done.

Exit code convention:

  • Exit 0: condition met → return success

  • Exit 2: condition failed → return failure

  • Any other code: still running → keep polling

Use this to wait for long-running operations: cloud builds, CI/CD, deployments, etc. Example: await_command(command="curl -sf https://ci.example.com/build/123/status | grep -q done", interval_seconds=30)

await_urlA

Block agent execution until a URL returns the expected HTTP status code. Optionally check that the response body contains a specific string. The agent is stuck on this call until the condition is met or timeout.

Example: await_url(url="http://localhost:3000/health", expected_status=200)

await_fileA

Block agent execution until a file exists and optionally contains a specific string. Useful for file-based signaling between processes (e.g., build status files).

Example: await_file(path="/tmp/build-status", contains="SUCCESS")

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct condition type: shell command, URL, or file. The purpose of each is clear, and there is no meaningful overlap in their intended use cases. An agent can easily select the right tool based on the resource it needs to wait on.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the consistent verb_noun pattern of 'await_' followed by the target resource (command, url, file). This makes the tool names predictable and easy to remember. The naming convention is uniform throughout the set.

Tool Count5/5

With three tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of providing wait-for-condition primitives. Each tool covers a distinct and common category of waiting (shell, HTTP, file), so the count feels neither thin nor excessive for the domain.

Completeness5/5

The three tools cover the primary methods for blocking on external signals: command exit status, URL availability/response, and file presence/content. This set provides a solid foundation for waiting on common CI/CD, deployment, and build scenarios. While a generic 'sleep' tool is absent, the command-based approach can handle arbitrary delays, making the surface reasonably complete.

Maintenance

ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues