Upload Internal App Sharing Apk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It does disclose that the tool is disabled in read-only mode, which is useful. However, it does not mention permissions, side effects, or what happens after the upload beyond the verb 'Upload.'

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler. The main action is front-loaded, and the read-only limitation is a secondary but relevant constraint. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter upload tool with a full output schema, the description is largely sufficient. It clearly identifies the operation and the read-only restriction. It lacks explicit sibling differentiation, but the resource-specific wording keeps the tool identifiable enough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already fully documented. The description adds no extra semantic detail about apk_path or package_name beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Upload'), a specific resource ('an APK'), and a specific destination ('internal app sharing'). This differentiates it from siblings like upload_internal_app_sharing_bundle (bundle vs APK) and upload_apk (internal sharing vs regular upload) without extra explanation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended context is implied by 'internal app sharing,' and the read-only restriction provides a clear exclusion. However, there is no explicit guidance about when to choose this over sibling tools such as upload_apk, upload_bundle, or upload_internal_app_sharing_bundle.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.