Get Order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It only restates the read intent and says nothing about permissions, whether refunded/voided orders are included, or error behavior. The word 'Get' signals non-destructive intent, but no additional behavioral context is added.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler words or redundant phrasing. It is concise, though the brevity comes at the cost of not providing important contextual or usage details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the two parameters are fully documented and an output schema exists, the surrounding context is incomplete given the large number of order/purchase/transaction siblings. The description does not clarify single-order versus batch semantics, what order types are covered, or how this relates to get_product_purchase or batch_get_orders.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and both parameters already have clear descriptions in the input schema. The tool description adds no further meaning about how order_id or package_name relate to each other or how they should be used, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and a clear resource ('detailed order/transaction information'), so the core action is understandable. However, it does not differentiate itself from sibling tools such as batch_get_orders or get_external_transaction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like batch_get_orders, get_product_purchase, or refund_order. There are no trigger conditions, exclusions, or context hints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.