Deploy App Multilang

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose important behavioral details such as whether deployment is immediate, requires confirmation, or affects existing releases. The confirm and confirmation_token parameters hint at safety mechanics but are not explained, leaving the mutation profile unclear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It is concise and easy to parse, though the brevity sacrifices operational detail that would be valuable for an agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters, no annotations, and many closely related deployment/release siblings, this description is too thin. It omits when-to-use guidance, confirmation/rollout behavior, and how this differs from deploy_app, leaving the agent to rely heavily on the schema and sibling list.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 71%, but the description adds little beyond what the schema already states: APK/AAB file and multi-language release notes. It does not clarify the semantics of confirm, confirmation_token, or rollout_percentage, which remain ambiguous despite being part of the input.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a concrete action—deploying an APK or AAB—and identifies the key differentiator of multi-language release notes. It is clear enough to distinguish from the sibling deploy_app, though it could more explicitly state that it targets a specific store release track.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus siblings like deploy_app, upload_apk, upload_bundle, or promote_release. There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions, so an agent must infer when this tool is the right choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.