cpanel_read_file
Reads the contents of any file on a cPanel server by providing its full path.
Instructions
Read contents of a file
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file | Yes | Full path to the file to read |
Reads the contents of any file on a cPanel server by providing its full path.
Read contents of a file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file | Yes | Full path to the file to read |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states basic function without disclosing behavior like read-only nature, permissions, size limits, or encoding.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise and front-loaded, though lacks structure like bullet points or example usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks information about return value format (e.g., raw content, encoding), error handling, or file type support, despite low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with clear description; tool description adds no extra meaning beyond 'Full path to the file to read'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool reads file contents, distinguishing it from siblings like cpanel_write_file and cpanel_delete_file.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like cpanel_list_files for directory listing, or prerequisites like file existence.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aandersen2323/cpanel-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server