Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
cPanel MCP Server

cPanel MCP Server

by aandersen2323
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

cpanel_delete_file

Delete files or directories from your cPanel hosting using their full file path.

Instructions

Delete a file or directory

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "file": "<file>"
    },
    "name": "cpanel_delete_file"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fileYesFull path to the file or directory to delete

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides no behavioral details beyond the action itself. Critical traits like recursive deletion, permission requirements, or error handling are omitted. Since no annotations exist, the description fails to inform the agent about important side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no filler, but it is too brief for a destructive tool. While efficient, it sacrifices necessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's destructive nature and the presence of sibling delete tools, the description should explain differences and outcomes. The lack of output schema and behavior details leaves the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes the parameter 'file' with 'Full path to the file or directory to delete', achieving 100% coverage. The description adds no extra meaning, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'a file or directory', making the tool's purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not differentiate from sibling delete tools for other entity types, which could be clearer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. For a destructive operation, such guidance is essential.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools