cpanel_delete_subdomain
Delete a subdomain by providing its full name, such as blog.domain.com.
Instructions
Delete a subdomain
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subdomain | Yes | Full subdomain name (e.g., 'blog.domain.com') |
Delete a subdomain by providing its full name, such as blog.domain.com.
Delete a subdomain
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subdomain | Yes | Full subdomain name (e.g., 'blog.domain.com') |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Delete a subdomain' without mentioning irreversibility, permissions needed, or error behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool, though it could benefit from additional context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate but lacks information about return values, success indicators, or error handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter is well-described with an example. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (subdomain). It is a specific verb+resource combo, but it does not distinguish from sibling tools like cpanel_create_subdomain or cpanel_list_subdomains.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are there any exclusions or prerequisites mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aandersen2323/cpanel-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server