Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
COMSOL MCP Server

COMSOL MCP Server

by Zhangyoupeng1996
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

model_save

Save a COMSOL model to file in multiple formats including Comsol, Java, Matlab, or VBA. Specify model name and file path for flexible storage.

Instructions

Save a COMSOL model to file.

Args: model_name: Name of the model to save (default: current model) file_path: Path to save to (default: original file path) format: Save format - 'Comsol', 'Java', 'Matlab', or 'VBA' (default: Comsol/.mph)

Returns: Save confirmation with file path, or error message

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "model_save"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
model_nameNo
file_pathNo
formatNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must carry the full burden. It does not disclose potential side effects such as overwriting existing files, state changes, or permission requirements. The return value is vaguely described as 'Save confirmation with file path, or error message'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured with a clear header, bullet-pointed parameters, and a returns section. Every sentence provides necessary information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers basic usage and return format but misses context such as prerequisites (e.g., model must be loaded), error conditions in detail, and behavior when file_path is omitted. Given the simple tool, it is minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds significant value by explaining each parameter's purpose and default value. It enumerates valid format options, which the schema lacks.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Save') and the resource ('a COMSOL model to file'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like model_load or model_save_version effectively.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., model_save_version). The description does not specify prerequisites or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools