Skip to main content
Glama
Zhangyoupeng1996

COMSOL MCP Server

by Zhangyoupeng1996
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to COMSOL MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • COMSOL MCP Server

      HBPEKING-TKS
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate COMSOL Multiphysics simulations, including model management, geometry building, physics configuration, meshing, solving, and results visualization through the MCP protocol.
      78
      MIT

    • comsol-mcp-server

      Qwup2112
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate COMSOL Multiphysics simulations, including model management, geometry building, physics configuration, meshing, solving, and results visualization via the MCP protocol.
      MIT

    • comsol-codex-mcp

      XiaoSe532
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for reproducible COMSOL Multiphysics batch workflows, enabling AI agents to compile, run, and diagnose Java API model scripts with COMSOL.
      4
      MIT

    • COMSOL MCP Server

      wjc9011
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate multiphysics simulations in COMSOL Multiphysics, covering model management, geometry building, physics configuration, and results visualization. It supports complex simulation workflows through the MCP protocol and includes integrated knowledge retrieval for documentation and troubleshooting.
      93
      736
      MIT

    • COMSOL MCP Server

      Howard-Lai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate COMSOL Multiphysics simulations, covering model management, geometry building, physics configuration, meshing, solving, and results visualization via the Model Context Protocol.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 78 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are well-grouped by prefixes (model_, geometry_, physics_, etc.) with distinct actions, but some overlap exists between generic and specific physics adders (physics_add vs physics_add_electrostatics) and between boundary condition setup tools (physics_boundary_selection vs physics_configure_boundary). These overlaps are partially mitigated by detailed descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., model_create, geometry_add_block, physics_add_heat_transfer). No mixed conventions or unpredictable deviations are observed.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 78 tools, the count is far beyond the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While COMSOL is a complex domain, this many tools may overwhelm an agent and increase selection difficulty. A more streamlined set focusing on core operations would be preferable.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full simulation lifecycle: model creation/manipulation, geometry construction (including boolean operations and import), physics setup (multiple interfaces, boundary conditions, materials), meshing, solving (including async and progress tracking), and results evaluation/export. Minor gaps include lack of independent material definition tools beyond physics assignment.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources