comsol_start

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses parameters and defaults, and mentions return values include session info or error, but does not detail side effects, auth needs, or whether it affects existing sessions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with clear sections for Args and Returns, containing only essential information. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool is simple, the description lacks details on prerequisites (e.g., COMSOL installation), whether the session starts synchronously, and the exact structure of 'session info'. An output schema is missing, but the return description is minimal.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description adds critical meaning: clarifies 'cores' default is 'all available' and 'version' default is 'latest installed' with example '6.0'. This significantly aids the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Start a local COMSOL client session' uses a specific verb ('start') and resource ('COMSOL client session'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like comsol_connect (connect to remote) and comsol_status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for local sessions via the word 'local', but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like comsol_connect, nor does it provide when-not or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.