Skip to main content
Glama
Yusufss4

positioning-mcp

by Yusufss4

Related Servers

Alternatives to positioning-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents to each drive one wheeled robot inside a single shared warehouse physics world, with a coordinator assigning crates and stepping the lockstep simulation while robot connections submit motion commands through six to seven exposed tools. Supports deterministic replay, hash-chain verification, and offline headless rendering of first-person, chase, overhead, and combined camera views from the recorded run.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables reproducible evaluation of AI agents on multi-source evidence investigation tasks, providing Docker-based scenarios, MCP tools, and automated scoring for payout reconciliation, performance-claim verification, and incident reconstruction.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables simulating deterministic tool failures and evaluating agent workflows against effect invariants, with action replay for reproducible fault analysis.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage or artifact in the positioning workflow: scenario discovery, venue metadata, engine config, simulation, replay, diagnostics, plotting, filter comparison, regression, and A/B testing. The closest pairs (simulate_scenario vs run_replay and compare_filters vs ab_test) are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions by input type and comparison scope.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case consistently and are readable. Most are verb_noun or clear action phrases, but a few noun phrases such as engine_config, error_breakdown, and ab_test deviate from a strict verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the expected range for a simulation and analysis server. Each tool covers a meaningful workflow step and none appears redundant or trivial.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core workflow well: discover scenarios and venues, simulate or replay, diagnose errors, visualize, compare filters/configs, and run regression checks. Minor gaps exist around explicit scenario/trace management or historical run listing, but these are not blocking for the stated analysis purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues