Skip to main content
Glama

Uninstall an add-on

browser_uninstall_addon
Destructive

Uninstall a Firefox extension by add-on ID, removing it from the browser until reinstalled. Use browser_list_addons to find the ID; some add-ons cannot be uninstalled.

Instructions

Uninstall an installed extension by id (AddonManager, privileged context). This is destructive and, unlike browser_set_addon_state, not simply reversible — the add-on would have to be installed again. Some add-ons cannot be uninstalled (permissions are reported as PERM_CAN_UNINSTALL false).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesAdd-on id, as reported by browser_list_addons

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Although annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, the description adds meaningful context: privileged AddonManager context, irreversibility requiring reinstallation, and the PERM_CAN_UNINSTALL false constraint. This goes well beyond what the annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each front-loaded with the key point: action and context, destructiveness and reversibility contrast, then a constraint. No wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter destructive tool with no output schema, the description covers what an agent needs: what it does, that it is irreversible, how it differs from the safer alternative, and when it may fail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the id parameter is already documented as coming from browser_list_addons. The description restates 'by id' but adds no syntax or format details beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Uninstall an installed extension by id') and names the execution context. It is clearly distinguishable from sibling tools such as browser_install_addon and browser_set_addon_state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly contrasts this tool with browser_set_addon_state, noting that uninstall is not simply reversible. It also states that some add-ons cannot be uninstalled, giving the agent a clear condition to check before invoking.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools