Skip to main content
Glama

Create Form

create_form

Create a new Google Form with a provided title and optional description, associated with the specified user's Google email address.

Instructions

Create a new form using the title given in the provided form message in the request.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesThe title of the form.
descriptionNoThe description of the form.
document_titleNoThe document title (shown in browser tab).
user_google_emailYesThe user's Google email address. Required.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Install Server

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a mutating, non-idempotent operation, so the bar is lower. The description adds a small behavioral detail about the title coming from 'the provided form message,' but it doesn't clarify side effects, authentication needs, or the created form's lifecycle.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. However, the phrasing 'using the title given in the provided form message in the request' is roundabout and slightly hurts clarity, preventing a top score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple creation tool, the full schema, annotations, and output schema carry much of the burden. The description is mostly sufficient, but it leaves a gap around when to use create_form versus form-update tools, and it never clarifies what 'provided form message' means.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already fully documents the parameters. The description adds no meaningful parameter semantics beyond the schema, and the phrase 'title given in the provided form message' could even create confusion about the source of the title parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource ('Create a new form'), and the word 'new' distinguishes it from update/get form siblings. The tail clause about 'provided form message' is ambiguous, but the core purpose is still clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives like batch_update_form, get_form, or set_publish_settings. It also doesn't mention prerequisites such as completing authentication or requiring an authenticated Google account.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/WorldCentralKitchen/google_workspace_mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server