toggle_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, placing the full burden on the description. The description only states 'Enable/disable a webhook' without clarifying whether it toggles the current state or sets it to a specific value, or any potential side effects. The existence of an output schema is not leveraged to mention return behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at 5 words, achieving front-loading of the core action. However, it may be too brief, lacking any structure or additional sentences that could improve clarity without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one parameter and an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the effect of toggling, the required ownership or permissions, or reference the output schema. The minimal description leaves the agent without sufficient context to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter (webhook_id) with 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not add any meaning beyond the schema. It does not explain what webhook_id is or how to obtain it, offering no value for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Enable/disable a webhook' uses a specific verb (enable/disable) and resource (webhook), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_webhook, delete_webhook, list_webhooks, and update_webhook. The toggle action is unique among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool instead of alternatives, such as whether update_webhook could also modify the enabled state. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., the webhook must exist) or context for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.