report_warehouse_store

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only says 'snapshot' without clarifying if it is read-only, whether it requires special permissions, or if any side effects occur. The behavioral transparency is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very short, but at the expense of completeness. It is not overly verbose, but could include more useful information in a similar length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the number of parameters (7), similar siblings, and the existence of an output schema, the description is insufficient. It lacks detail on filtering, pagination, and the exact content of the snapshot.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 14% (only 'include' has a description). The description adds no parameter-level meaning; it does not explain the purpose of start_date, end_date, warehouse_id, sku_sku, limit, or page.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description indicates a snapshot of current warehouse storage, but it is vague about what data is included (e.g., quantities, SKUs?). It does not differentiate from similar sibling tools like report_warehouse_stock or report_inventories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus the many sibling report tools (e.g., report_inventories, report_warehouse_stock). No conditions, prerequisites, or alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.