Skip to main content
Glama

What tools exist here, and when to reach for each

emem_tools
Read-onlyIdempotent

Find the right emem tool by topic, output shape, or job, then get its input schema and a runnable example. Start here when you don't know which tool answers your question.

Instructions

The map of emem's tool surface, and the only tool you need to find the rest. Returns the working loop in the order you walk it (name a thing, ground it, cite it, resolve it, verify it, check for drift), then every other tool grouped by the question it answers, each with its one-line trigger. Pass name to get one tool's full input schema and a runnable example, so you can use a tool without loading all of the descriptors into context. IF YOU ARE READING A LIST OF 16 TOOLS, YOU ARE SEEING A CURATED SUBSET OF 108, NOT THE WHOLE SURFACE. The count is served in tools/list _meta and _discovery, and most MCP hosts strip non-standard top-level fields before a model sees them, so it is repeated HERE — a description is the one field every host passes through. The Earth-observation, search, embedding and transparency-log tools are catalogued by this tool and every one of them stays callable by name through tools/call at either endpoint.

When to use: Call this FIRST when you do not know which emem tool answers the question, or when you need a capability you cannot see in your tool list. This responder advertises a small core loop by default rather than its full catalog, so a tool being absent from your list does not mean it is absent from the server. Pass q to search by topic (ndvi, cloud, flood, verify), name for one tool's exact schema, or no arguments for the whole map. If you want the full catalog registered as callable tools instead, reconnect to the /mcp/full endpoint; for a one-shot answer without picking a primitive at all, use emem_ask.

Example arguments: {"q":"ndvi"}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoFree-text filter over tool names, titles and trigger text, e.g. `ndvi`, `cloud`, `flood`, `verify`, `token`. Plain lowercased substring over name + title + description + trigger text, not fuzzy and not stemmed: `ndvi` hits, `vegetation index` only hits tools that spell that phrase. Combines with `shape`/`bundle`/`category`/`tier` as AND, so an over-narrow combination answers with an empty catalog rather than an error.
nameNoReturn the full descriptor for exactly this tool (input schema, runnable example, annotations), e.g. `emem_ndvi`. Use this when you already know the name and want its schema without loading the whole catalog. It SHORT-CIRCUITS: when `name` is set every other argument here is ignored, so `{name, q}` is not a search within one tool. A name this responder does not carry is not an error status, you get a body with `did_you_mean` holding up to five names that share a substring with what you asked for.
tierNoWhich slice to list. Defaults to `all`, so this tool shows the whole surface even when the endpoint advertises only the core loop, and an `extended` tool you find here is callable by name through tools/call whether or not your host listed it. Pass `core` to see only what a default connection advertises.
shapeNoFilter by what the answer looks like, which is usually the real question. `scalar` is one number at one address; `raster` is a gridded field over an area; `timeseries` is a value per timestep; `vector` is a learned embedding; `identity` is a canonical name for a thing; `token` is a citation handle; `proof` checks one.
bundleNoFilter by the job you are doing. Call with no arguments first to see each bundle and its size.
categoryNoFilter to one category. This is about the shape of the job, NOT about safety: 13 tools outside `write` declare `readOnlyHint: false` because reading a cold address can materialise or mint as a side effect, so `category: "read"` is not a safe-tools filter. Read each result's `annotations.readOnlyHint` for that.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark readOnlyHint/idempotentHint true, and the description adds substantial non-obvious behavior on top: the tool advertises only a small core loop by default so absence from a tool list does not mean absence from the server, and the ALL-CAPS warning explains that hosts strip _meta/_discovery fields so the 108 count is deliberately repeated in the description. It also discloses that catalogued tools stay callable by name through tools/call at either endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded and the When-to-use section is clearly delineated with an example, but the middle is verbose: the capslock sentence packs a real operational fact into a long, winding justification, and two sentences about catalogued tools being callable via tools/call partly repeat each other.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a six-parameter discovery tool with no output schema, the description covers return shape (working-loop order, question-grouped tools, one-line triggers, full descriptor for name), the critical 108-vs-16 context trap, the tools/call mechanism, and routing to alternatives. Nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with each of the six parameters already richly documented (substring match semantics, name short-circuit, did_you_mean, category-not-safety warning). The description adds only light usage pointers — pass q for topic, name for exact schema, no arguments for the whole map — plus an example, so it stays at the baseline rather than compensating for any schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens by naming the exact job — 'The map of emem's tool surface' — and describes the concrete returns: the working loop in walk order, then tools grouped by question with one-line triggers. It distinguishes itself from siblings by naming what it is not: emem_ask for one-shot answers and the /mcp/full endpoint for a fully registered catalog.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Has an explicit 'When to use' section saying to call this FIRST when you don't know which tool answers or need a capability not visible in the tool list. It also states exclusions and alternatives: reconnect to /mcp/full to register the full catalog, or use emem_ask for a one-shot answer without picking a primitive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Vortx-AI/emem'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server