Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to emem

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to interact with the Planet API for satellite imagery ordering, subscriptions, and data management through natural language.
    17
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to query verifiable physical-world ground truth for any point on Earth — water availability, seismic and space-weather hazard, ground stability, and resource indications — with every answer backed by a Bitcoin-anchored provenance record that can be independently verified. It also lets agents check whether an Earth-science hypothesis has already been tested, list documented nulls and retractions, and run bounded controlled tests that return UNTESTABLE rather than fabricate a result.
    11
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Gives AI a virtual body to explore real locations on Earth using authentic terrain, weather, sky, radio, wildlife, and cultural data, with tools for walking, observing, asking about history, and collecting souvenirs—fully offline-capable.
    4
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables users to pin lessons, claims, and open questions about physical objects to the places they live, then resume that thread later from any phone or assistant through three tools: observe, ask, and commit. Matching runs on host-authored text descriptions and user-named places, so no images are stored and identity survives switching devices, apps, or models.
    3
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 18 tools

Disambiguation3/5

The set has several overlapping read paths: emem_ask, emem_intent, search/fetch, emem_recall and emem_locate can all answer place questions, while verify_receipt, echo_verify and guard_verdict form a related verification cluster. The descriptions explicitly distinguish sibling tools, but an agent still has to read carefully to avoid misselection.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools use an emem_ prefix, but search and fetch are generic unprefixed names, and the set mixes verb-style names (locate, recall, ask, verify) with noun-style names (memory_token, memory_bundle, entity, intent, tools). The convention is readable but not predictable throughout.

Tool Count3/5

At 18 tools this is in the borderline-heavy range for the rubric, and the broad geospatial/memory domain makes some breadth reasonable. However, multiple tools provide layered alternatives for similar outcomes, so the count feels somewhat heavier than necessary.

Completeness4/5

The core lifecycle is well covered: locate, recall, search/fetch, cite, resolve, verify, guard, contradictions, entities, bundles and similarity search. There are still gaps such as polygon recall, trajectory, diff and edge-recall tools referenced in descriptions, though emem_tools and emem_intent provide partial workarounds.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive